MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Johan Nikles [639th] vs Benjamin OConnell [] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

H2H: Nikles 0 - 0 OConnell

Nikles vs OConnell H2H Profile
Nikles Stats OConnell
56% (9-7) YTD Win/Loss 0% (0-0)
0 Head-to-Head 0
639 Ranking N/A
256 Highest Rank N/A
28 Age 26
R Plays -
4 Titles 0
58% (296-213) Career Total W/L 0% (0-0)
$11,650 Career Prize Money $0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Nikles VS OConnell H2H Matches played

No H2H Matches Available

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Johan Nikles vs Benjamin OConnell Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Nikles 0 - 0 OConnell

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nikles has won 42.28% of points on their second serve, while OConnell has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nikles, in recent form, has won 46.9% of their opponent's second serve points, while OConnell has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.23% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Nikles has saved 51.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas OConnell has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Nikles has won 60% of matches played (W/L 33/ 22), with OConnell winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Nikles has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 88/ 55), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 23% (W/L 3/ 10). OConnell has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
  • Player level: In the last year, Nikles has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.04% of matches (W/L 29/ 17), where as OConnell has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nikles has played against opponents with an average rank of 324.85 while OConnell has played against players with an average rank of .
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nikles has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while OConnell has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Nikles has converted 38.2% of breakpoint opportunities, and OConnell has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Johan Nikles Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    QF
    cross
    Stefanos Sakellaridis
    Player
    Johan Nikles
    65% ( 56 of 86)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 50 of 76)
    4
    Aces
    0
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    71% ( 40 of 56)
    1st Serve Won
    48% ( 24 of 50)
    40% ( 12 of 30)
    2nd Serve Won
    62% ( 16 of 26)
    58% ( 7 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    57% ( 4 of 7)
    40% ( 34 of 86)
    Rtn Points Won
    47% ( 36 of 76)
    88
    Total Points Won
    74
    L
    5-7 6-2 6-2 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Johan Nikles
    Player
    Alexis Canter
    80% ( 48 of 60)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 32 of 57)
    1
    Aces
    0
    3
    Double Faults
    3
    65% ( 31 of 48)
    1st Serve Won
    56% ( 18 of 32)
    50% ( 6 of 12)
    2nd Serve Won
    36% ( 9 of 25)
    50% ( 5 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 3 of 3)
    38% ( 23 of 60)
    Rtn Points Won
    53% ( 30 of 57)
    67
    Total Points Won
    50
    W
    6-4 6-4 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Johan Nikles
    Player
    Billy Suarez
    57% ( 36 of 63)
    1st Serve %
    57% ( 34 of 60)
    0
    Aces
    1
    3
    Double Faults
    1
    61% ( 22 of 36)
    1st Serve Won
    41% ( 14 of 34)
    59% ( 16 of 27)
    2nd Serve Won
    50% ( 13 of 26)
    56% ( 5 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 3 of 6)
    40% ( 25 of 63)
    Rtn Points Won
    55% ( 33 of 60)
    71
    Total Points Won
    52
    W
    6-1 7-6(5) H2H
    R1
    cross
    Guillaume Dalmasso
    Player
    Johan Nikles
    51% ( 23 of 45)
    1st Serve %
    76% ( 39 of 51)
    2
    Aces
    0
    4
    Double Faults
    3
    74% ( 17 of 23)
    1st Serve Won
    44% ( 17 of 39)
    55% ( 12 of 22)
    2nd Serve Won
    17% ( 2 of 12)
    100% ( 6 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    67% ( 2 of 3)
    36% ( 16 of 45)
    Rtn Points Won
    63% ( 32 of 51)
    61
    Total Points Won
    35
    L
    7-5 6-0 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Ilya Ivashka
    Player
    Johan Nikles
    92% ( 48 of 52)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 37 of 57)
    0
    Aces
    0
    0
    Double Faults
    2
    71% ( 34 of 48)
    1st Serve Won
    51% ( 19 of 37)
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 9 of 20)
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 2)
    29% ( 15 of 52)
    Rtn Points Won
    51% ( 29 of 57)
    66
    Total Points Won
    43
    L
    6-2 6-2 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
    Player
    Johan Nikles
    56% ( 42 of 75)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 55 of 93)
    2
    Aces
    2
    6
    Double Faults
    8
    69% ( 29 of 42)
    1st Serve Won
    58% ( 32 of 55)
    39% ( 13 of 33)
    2nd Serve Won
    37% ( 14 of 38)
    40% ( 6 of 15)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 4 of 8)
    44% ( 33 of 75)
    Rtn Points Won
    51% ( 47 of 93)
    89
    Total Points Won
    79
    L
    7-5 6-4 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Murphy Cassone
    Player
    Johan Nikles
    69% ( 44 of 64)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 42 of 71)
    4
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    73% ( 32 of 44)
    1st Serve Won
    60% ( 25 of 42)
    60% ( 12 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    52% ( 15 of 29)
    38% ( 3 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    31% ( 20 of 64)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 31 of 71)
    75
    Total Points Won
    60
    L
    7-5 6-3 H2H
    F
    cross
    Cem Ilkel
    Player
    Johan Nikles
    68% ( 25 of 37)
    1st Serve %
    55% ( 31 of 56)
    2
    Aces
    0
    0
    Double Faults
    2
    84% ( 21 of 25)
    1st Serve Won
    52% ( 16 of 31)
    58% ( 7 of 12)
    2nd Serve Won
    28% ( 7 of 25)
    45% ( 5 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    24% ( 9 of 37)
    Rtn Points Won
    59% ( 33 of 56)
    61
    Total Points Won
    32
    L
    6-1 6-1 H2H
    SF
    cross
    Johan Nikles
    Player
    Tuncay Duran
    67% ( 28 of 42)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 23 of 37)
    0
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    2
    79% ( 22 of 28)
    1st Serve Won
    48% ( 11 of 23)
    50% ( 7 of 14)
    2nd Serve Won
    29% ( 4 of 14)
    50% ( 5 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 4)
    31% ( 13 of 42)
    Rtn Points Won
    59% ( 22 of 37)
    51
    Total Points Won
    28
    W
    6-2 6-0 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Johan Nikles
    Player
    Valentin Lapalu
    61% ( 30 of 49)
    1st Serve %
    67% ( 33 of 49)
    0
    Aces
    0
    4
    Double Faults
    3
    73% ( 22 of 30)
    1st Serve Won
    48% ( 16 of 33)
    53% ( 10 of 19)
    2nd Serve Won
    44% ( 7 of 16)
    83% ( 5 of 6)
    Break Points Won
    20% ( 1 of 5)
    35% ( 17 of 49)
    Rtn Points Won
    53% ( 26 of 49)
    58
    Total Points Won
    40
    W
    6-3 6-2 H2H

    Benjamin OConnell Recent Matches Played

    No Recent Matches Available

    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Nikles & OConnell Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Johan Nikles Nikles Stats Benjamin OConnell OConnell
    58% (296/213) Win/Loss 0% (0/0)
    56% (655/506) Sets Win/Loss 0% (0/0)
    53% (5643/5025) Games Win/Loss 0% (0/0)
    0.06 Aces Per Game 0
    312 Aces Total 0
    0.2 Double Faults Per Game 0
    1066 Total Double Faults 0
    1:22:24 Average Match Time 1st Match
    492.7 Average Opponent Rank 0
    67% (19180/28773) 1st Serve % 0% (0/0)
    61% (11611/19180) 1st Serve Win % 0% (0/0)
    48% (4564/9593) 2nd Serve Win % 0% (0/0)
    46% (1651/3579) Break Points Won % (Total) 0% (0/0)
    45% (13074/29005) Return Points Win % 0% (0/0)
    58% (292/501) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
    100% (1/1) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
    54% (58/108) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 0% (0/0)
    56% (83/149) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/0)
    88% (277/244) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (0/0)
    12% (277/32) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (0/0)
    22% (232/52) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (0/0)

    Other Predictions

    San Miguel de Tucuman Challenger

    flag
    20 Apr
    flag
    19:00
    Prediction

    San Miguel de Tucuman Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...